Dr Bronte Douglass v Lawton Pty Limited (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 90

Dr Bronte Douglass v Lawton Pty Limited (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 90

No error was shown in the trial judge's exercise of discretion in making the costs order; the order was not punitive in terms and reflected a typical ruling where a late amendment occasioned an adjournment. The judge's comments during the proceeding were not determinative and did not reflect a breach of relevant...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 April 2007
Procedural Posture
Summons for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave Application
Outcome
Summons for Leave to Appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['costs' 'amendment of Pleadings' 'adjournment' 'judicial Discretion']
['civil Procedure'] ['costs' 'amendment of Pleadings' 'adjournment' 'judicial Discretion']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Summons for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave Application

  1. 1 ['Whether the trial judge erred in making a costs order against the defendant following an adjournment occasioned by a late amendment to the defence' 'Whether the costs order was made for punitive purposes rather than to indemnify the successful party' 'Whether the adjournment of proceedings was necessary due to the amendment']

Ratio Decidendi

No error was shown in the trial judge's exercise of discretion in making the costs order; the order was not punitive in terms and reflected a typical ruling where a late amendment occasioned an adjournment. The judge's comments during the proceeding were not determinative and did not reflect a breach of relevant principles.

Court Disposition

Summons for Leave to Appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['The Summons for Leave to Appeal is dismissed with costs']