Dr Bronte Douglass v Lawton Pty Limited (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 90
No error was shown in the trial judge's exercise of discretion in making the costs order; the order was not punitive in terms and reflected a typical ruling where a late amendment occasioned an adjournment. The judge's comments during the proceeding were not determinative and did not reflect a breach of relevant...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Summons for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave Application
- Outcome
- Summons for Leave to Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'amendment of Pleadings' 'adjournment' 'judicial Discretion']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Summons for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trial judge erred in making a costs order against the defendant following an adjournment occasioned by a late amendment to the defence' 'Whether the costs order was made for punitive purposes rather than to indemnify the successful party' 'Whether the adjournment of proceedings was necessary due to the amendment']
Ratio Decidendi
No error was shown in the trial judge's exercise of discretion in making the costs order; the order was not punitive in terms and reflected a typical ruling where a late amendment occasioned an adjournment. The judge's comments during the proceeding were not determinative and did not reflect a breach of relevant principles.
Court Disposition
Summons for Leave to Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The Summons for Leave to Appeal is dismissed with costs']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment