Doyle v NSW Maritime (No 2) [2012] NSWADT 55

Doyle v NSW Maritime (No 2) [2012] NSWADT 55

The Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the respondent's application for costs after the substantive proceedings were dismissed for want of jurisdiction, but there was no basis to depart from the general rule that each party bears its own costs, as Dr Doyle's conduct was not vexatious or disadvantageous to the respondent, and his application was not without any foundation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 March 2012
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of Administrative Decision / Costs Determination Following Dismissal for Want of Jurisdiction
Outcome
Respondent's application for costs refused
Legal Topics
['costs' 'jurisdiction' 'administrative Review']
['administrative Law'] ['costs' 'jurisdiction' 'administrative Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Review of Administrative Decision / Costs Determination Following Dismissal for Want of Jurisdiction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the respondent's application for costs after dismissing the substantive application for want of jurisdiction" 'Whether an award of costs in favour of the respondent is fair under s 88 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the respondent's application for costs after the substantive proceedings were dismissed for want of jurisdiction, but there was no basis to depart from the general rule that each party bears its own costs, as Dr Doyle's conduct was not vexatious or disadvantageous to the respondent, and his application was not without any foundation.

Court Disposition

Respondent's application for costs refused

Orders

  • ["The respondent's application for costs is refused."]