Health Care Complaints Commission v Marino [2016] NSWCATOD 37
The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities and applying the Briginshaw standard, that Dr Marino was guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct for inadequate clinical assessment, inappropriate prescribing, and inadequate record keeping in relation to Patient A, as well as serious breaches of professional boundaries (including sexual contact with a patient) constituting professional misconduct under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW).
- Parties
- Complainant: Health Care Complaints Commission; Respondent: Dr Giuliano Marino
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Professional Discipline / Liability Hearing (stage 1 of Two Stage Process); Proceedings Stood Over for Stage 2 – Determination of Orders
- Outcome
- Respondent found guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct.
- Legal Topics
- Unsatisfactory Professional Conduct, Professional Misconduct, Medical Records, Prescription of Medication, Sexual Boundaries in Doctor Patient Relationship
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Health Care Complaints Commission
Complainant
Dr Giuliano Marino
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Professional Discipline / Liability Hearing (stage 1 of Two Stage Process); Proceedings Stood Over for Stage 2 – Determination of Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) in relation to treatment of Patient A, record keeping, prescribing medication, and maintenance of professional boundaries, including sexual misconduct.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities and applying the Briginshaw standard, that Dr Marino was guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct for inadequate clinical assessment, inappropriate prescribing, and inadequate record keeping in relation to Patient A, as well as serious breaches of professional boundaries (including sexual contact with a patient) constituting professional misconduct under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW).
Court Disposition
Respondent found guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and professional misconduct.
Orders
- Proceedings stood over for stage 2 hearing (orders/protective measures) on 26 April 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment