EDELSTEN v RICHMOND [1989] NSWCA 71
None of the technical grounds for invalidity put forward by the applicant are made out; the Medical Tribunal and Medical Board were constituted and acted pursuant to the statutory scheme, and delegation and appointments satisfied requirements of the Medical Practitioners Act 1938 as amended.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Dr GW Edelsten; Respondent: Richmond; Interested Party: New South Wales Medical Board; Interested Party: Medical Tribunal of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Medical Practitioners Registration, Tribunal Constitution, Delegation of Authority, Statutory Interpretation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr GW Edelsten
Applicant
Richmond
Respondent
New South Wales Medical Board
Interested Party
Medical Tribunal of New South Wales
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Medical Tribunal's orders were nullities due to alleged defects in constitution and appointments
- 2 Whether the New South Wales Medical Board was properly constituted under amended legislation
- 3 Validity of delegation of Board's powers to appoint Tribunal members
Ratio Decidendi
None of the technical grounds for invalidity put forward by the applicant are made out; the Medical Tribunal and Medical Board were constituted and acted pursuant to the statutory scheme, and delegation and appointments satisfied requirements of the Medical Practitioners Act 1938 as amended.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Summons dismissed
- Applicant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment