Denney v Baxter [2007] NSWLEC 858
The Court found that tree roots likely caused historical sewer blockages but noted lack of repair to original pipes and insufficient evidence of current or imminent substantial damage or risk from the trees/shrubs. Orders for managed pruning were made by consent, along with arrangements for cost sharing, and no order was made for compensation for past or future sewer damage or for legal costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: Dr John & Lieselotte Denney; Respondent: Harold & Michelle Baxter
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Neighbour Application / Ex Tempore Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld in part; orders made by consent of parties.
- Legal Topics
- Trees (disputes Between Neighbours), Neighbour Disputes, Arborist Report, Reimbursement of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr John & Lieselotte Denney
Applicant
Harold & Michelle Baxter
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Neighbour Application / Ex Tempore Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trees and shrubs on the Baxter property caused or are likely to cause damage to the Denney property or injury to persons
- 2 Appropriate orders for pruning, compensation, and responsibility for costs
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that tree roots likely caused historical sewer blockages but noted lack of repair to original pipes and insufficient evidence of current or imminent substantial damage or risk from the trees/shrubs. Orders for managed pruning were made by consent, along with arrangements for cost sharing, and no order was made for compensation for past or future sewer damage or for legal costs.
Court Disposition
Application upheld in part; orders made by consent of parties.
Orders
- Shrubs and small trees along boundary to be pruned as specified, above lattice to 0.3m clear of boundary, below lattice to boundary, branches pushing on fence to be trimmed.
- Deodar tree to have four major northern branches pruned to boundary and further as necessary per AS 4373 and Council approval; other branches to 1.0m on Applicants' side, lesser work if required by Council.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment