Health Care Complaints Commission v Dr Ristevski [2012] NSWMT 23
The respondent's prolonged sexual relationship with Patient A while she remained his patient, his failure to maintain proper clinical records after July 2006, Patient A's vulnerability as a young married woman, mother and employee, and the Tribunal's rejection of the respondent's claimed insight and confidence that he would not re-offend made the misconduct sufficiently serious to constitute professional misconduct and required cancellation of registration for protection of the public and the profession.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Medical Disciplinary Complaint / Decision After Hearing on Complaints and Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Complaints established; respondent reprimanded; registration cancelled with effect from 5pm on 31 January 2013; respondent ordered to pay the applicant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['doctor Patient Boundaries' 'unsatisfactory Professional Conduct' 'professional Misconduct' 'medical Record Keeping' 'cancellation of Registration' 'reprimand' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Medical Disciplinary Complaint / Decision After Hearing on Complaints and Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondent's admitted conduct constituted unsatisfactory professional conduct within Section 139B of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) No 86A." 'Whether the unsatisfactory professional conduct was of a sufficiently serious nature to constitute professional misconduct within Section 139E of the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (NSW) No 86A.' "Whether the respondent's registration should be cancelled or whether lesser orders and conditions were appropriate." 'Whether the criminal finding for assault occasioning actual bodily harm justified cancellation of registration under Section 149C(1)(c).']
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent's prolonged sexual relationship with Patient A while she remained his patient, his failure to maintain proper clinical records after July 2006, Patient A's vulnerability as a young married woman, mother and employee, and the Tribunal's rejection of the respondent's claimed insight and confidence that he would not re-offend made the misconduct sufficiently serious to constitute professional misconduct and required cancellation of registration for protection of the public and the profession.
Court Disposition
Complaints established; respondent reprimanded; registration cancelled with effect from 5pm on 31 January 2013; respondent ordered to pay the applicant's costs.
Orders
- ['The respondent is reprimanded.' "The respondent's registration is cancelled with effect from 5pm on 31 January 2013." "The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of the proceedings."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment