Pearce & Heers v Liprini (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 530
Given the plaintiffs' successful opposition to the defendant's application, the absence of submissions from the defendant, the significant discount sought, and the evidence provided, it was appropriate, efficient, and fair to fix the plaintiffs' recoverable costs at $6,000 pursuant to s 98(4)(c) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.
- Parties
- Plaintiffs: Pearce & Heers; Defendant: Dr Liprini
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application / Post Judgment—determination of Costs Following Dismissed Application to Set Aside Orders Under Vexatious Proceedings Act
- Outcome
- Defendant to pay plaintiffs' costs, fixed at $6,000 exclusive of GST.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Vexatious Proceedings, Fixed Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pearce & Heers
Plaintiffs
Dr Liprini
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / Post Judgment—determination of Costs Following Dismissed Application to Set Aside Orders Under Vexatious Proceedings Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded to the plaintiffs following dismissal of defendant's application under the Vexatious Proceedings Act
- 2 Whether the court should fix costs rather than order assessment
Ratio Decidendi
Given the plaintiffs' successful opposition to the defendant's application, the absence of submissions from the defendant, the significant discount sought, and the evidence provided, it was appropriate, efficient, and fair to fix the plaintiffs' recoverable costs at $6,000 pursuant to s 98(4)(c) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.
Court Disposition
Defendant to pay plaintiffs' costs, fixed at $6,000 exclusive of GST.
Orders
- Dr Liprini is to pay the plaintiffs' costs of the application before the court, fixed in the sum of $6,000 exclusive of GST.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment