Ogawa v Carter (Delegate of Finance Minister) [2021] FCAFC 16

Ogawa v Carter (Delegate of Finance Minister) [2021] FCAFC 16

The appellant failed to discharge the onus of proof required to establish absence of lawful authority or that relevant considerations were not taken into account; the primary judge was correct that the decision was neither unlawfully made nor legally unreasonable.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 February 2021
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Court Decision Dismissing Application for Judicial Review
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'delegation of Statutory Powers' 'visa Criteria' 'discretionary Relief' 'unreasonableness' 'relevant Considerations' 'onus of Proof']
['administrative Law'] ['judicial Review' 'delegation of Statutory Powers' 'visa Criteria' 'discretionary Relief' 'unreasonableness' 'relevant Considerations' 'onus of Proof']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Court Decision Dismissing Application for Judicial Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the decision-maker had lawful authority to approve the repayment plan' "Whether the decision-maker failed to take into account the debtor's ability to pay" 'Whether the decision was legally unreasonable']

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to discharge the onus of proof required to establish absence of lawful authority or that relevant considerations were not taken into account; the primary judge was correct that the decision was neither unlawfully made nor legally unreasonable.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the appeal, to be fixed by a registrar if not agreed."]