Health Care Complaints Commission v Shinwari [2015] NSWCATOD 59

Health Care Complaints Commission v Shinwari [2015] NSWCATOD 59

Dr Shinwari's conduct, individually and in aggregate, in failing to acquaint himself with ROD guidelines, perform necessary assessments, maintain adequate clinical records, properly instruct and supervise staff, and appreciate the significance of abnormal medical findings, constituted professional misconduct as it was significantly below accepted standards and sufficiently serious to justify suspension or cancellation of registration.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 June 2015
Procedural Posture
Professional Discipline / Determination of Liability (stage 1), Further Orders and Penalty to Be Determined at Stage 2
Outcome
Respondent found guilty of professional misconduct; interim practice conditions imposed; matter stood over for Stage 2 hearing.
Legal Topics
['professional Misconduct' 'unsatisfactory Professional Conduct' 'medical Record Keeping' 'rapid Opioid Detoxification' 'medical Practitioner Standards']
['health Law' 'professional Regulation' 'administrative Law'] ['professional Misconduct' 'unsatisfactory Professional Conduct' 'medical Record Keeping' 'rapid Opioid Detoxification' 'medical Practitioner Standards']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Professional Discipline / Determination of Liability (stage 1), Further Orders and Penalty to Be Determined at Stage 2

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Dr Shinwari was guilty of unsatisfactory professional conduct and/or professional misconduct under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law in relation to administering Rapid Opioid Detoxification (ROD) procedures and record-keeping' 'Whether failures in assessment, monitoring, documentation, and supervision of ROD procedures constituted professional misconduct']

Ratio Decidendi

Dr Shinwari's conduct, individually and in aggregate, in failing to acquaint himself with ROD guidelines, perform necessary assessments, maintain adequate clinical records, properly instruct and supervise staff, and appreciate the significance of abnormal medical findings, constituted professional misconduct as it was significantly below accepted standards and sufficiently serious to justify suspension or cancellation of registration.

Court Disposition

Respondent found guilty of professional misconduct; interim practice conditions imposed; matter stood over for Stage 2 hearing.

Orders

  • ['The respondent to serve written references and any documents upon which reliance is placed within 21 days.' 'The complainant to serve any further documents within 14 days of receiving the respondent’s materials.' 'The respondent to serve reply documents within 7 days thereafter.' 'All documents to be filed with...