HCCC v Kalokerinos [2007] NSWMT 17
The Tribunal found that the respondent prescribed drugs of addiction without authority, failed to maintain proper professional boundaries with a vulnerable patient, inadequately maintained clinical and drug records, and contravened statutory and regulatory obligations. His conduct, persisting over years and lacking remediation, amounted to professional misconduct warranting removal from the Register of Medical Practitioners and a restriction on re-registration for three years.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Disciplinary Tribunal Proceeding / Final Determination and Orders
- Outcome
- Respondent found guilty of professional misconduct. Respondent's name ordered removed from the Register of Medical Practitioners and barred from re-registration for three years. Respondent ordered to pay applicant's costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['professional Misconduct' 'unsatisfactory Professional Conduct' 'prescription of Drugs of Addiction' 'failure to Maintain Boundaries' 'record Keeping' 'regulation Compliance']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Disciplinary Tribunal Proceeding / Final Determination and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the respondent's conduct constituted professional misconduct and/or unsatisfactory professional conduct under the Medical Practice Act 1992" 'Whether the respondent failed to maintain proper boundaries with a patient' 'Whether the respondent prescribed drugs of addiction without authority' 'Whether proper records were maintained for prescribed treatments' 'Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory and regulatory obligations']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the respondent prescribed drugs of addiction without authority, failed to maintain proper professional boundaries with a vulnerable patient, inadequately maintained clinical and drug records, and contravened statutory and regulatory obligations. His conduct, persisting over years and lacking remediation, amounted to professional misconduct warranting removal from the Register of Medical Practitioners and a restriction on re-registration for three years.
Court Disposition
Respondent found guilty of professional misconduct. Respondent's name ordered removed from the Register of Medical Practitioners and barred from re-registration for three years. Respondent ordered to pay applicant's costs.
Orders
- ['The respondent will cease practicing medicine at 5.00 pm, 26th April 2007.' "The respondent's name be removed from the Register of Medical Practitioners on 24th May 2007." 'The respondent not apply to be re-registered for a period of three years from the date of these orders.' "The respondent pay the applicant's...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment