Donovan v Mijuskovic [2007] NSWLEC 650
It was established that there is a serious question to be tried as to whether building works were carried out without development consent, and the balance of convenience favors granting the interlocutory injunction for a short period giving respondents opportunity to be heard later.
- Parties
- Applicant: Dr Raymond Donovan; Applicant: Associate Professor Leong Chan; Respondent: Milenko Mijuskovic; Respondent: Kate Melhuish; Respondent: Woollahra Municipal Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Proceedings / Interlocutory (ex Parte Motion for Interlocutory Injunction)
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunction granted pending further hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Injunctions, Development Consent, Ex Parte Applications, Substituted Service
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Raymond Donovan
Applicant
Associate Professor Leong Chan
Applicant
Milenko Mijuskovic
Respondent
Kate Melhuish
Respondent
Woollahra Municipal Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Proceedings / Interlocutory (ex Parte Motion for Interlocutory Injunction)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interlocutory injunction should be granted to restrain alleged unauthorised building works until development consent is obtained
- 2 Whether the requirements for substituted service are satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
It was established that there is a serious question to be tried as to whether building works were carried out without development consent, and the balance of convenience favors granting the interlocutory injunction for a short period giving respondents opportunity to be heard later.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunction granted pending further hearing.
Orders
- Applicants to give the usual undertaking as to damages.
- First and second respondents restrained from further works at 168 Sutherland Street, Paddington, until 4pm on 3 October 2007.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment