TRAU v UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY [1994] NSWCA 316

TRAU v UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY [1994] NSWCA 316

Extension of time and leave to appeal should be refused as there is little or no real prospect of the appeal succeeding and the delay does not justify granting an extension in the circumstances of the case.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Dr Trau; Respondent: University of Sydney
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 November 1994
Procedural Posture
Application / Court of Appeal Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for extension of time and application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Summary Judgment
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Leave to Appeal Summary Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr Trau

Applicant

University of Sydney

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application / Court of Appeal Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether extension of time to apply for leave to appeal should be granted
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted from orders of Smart J

Ratio Decidendi

Extension of time and leave to appeal should be refused as there is little or no real prospect of the appeal succeeding and the delay does not justify granting an extension in the circumstances of the case.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time and application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Application for extension of time dismissed with costs.
  • Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.