DR v Commission for Children and Young People [2008] NSWADT 137
The applicant is not entitled to make a review application as the conviction falls within 'similar offence' provisions of s33G(1), and the age difference between applicant and victim exceeded three years, so s33G(2) does not apply.
- Parties
- Applicant: DR; Respondent: Commission for Children and Young People
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Preliminary Matter / Preliminary Determination on Entitlement to Make Review Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction; applicant not entitled to make review application.
- Legal Topics
- Entitlement to Make Review Application, Prohibited Person Status, Child Related Employment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DR
Applicant
Commission for Children and Young People
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Matter / Preliminary Determination on Entitlement to Make Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to make a review application under the Commission for Children and Young People Act 1998 given previous conviction
- 2 Whether the offence for which applicant was convicted is a 'similar offence' under s33G(1) of the Act
- 3 Whether the exception in s33G(2) applies to the applicant
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is not entitled to make a review application as the conviction falls within 'similar offence' provisions of s33G(1), and the age difference between applicant and victim exceeded three years, so s33G(2) does not apply.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction; applicant not entitled to make review application.
Orders
- By the operation of section 33G of the Commission for Children and Young People Act 1998 the applicant is not entitled to make a review application under that Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment