Drama Unit Pty Ltd v Fearndale Holdings Pty Ltd (Administrator Appointed) & Anor [2018] NSWSC 1895
The termination of the lease by Fearndale was ineffective because the notice given to Drama Unit to remedy the breach (failure to obtain mining authority) did not allow a 'reasonable time' as required by s 129 of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW); thus, the right of re-entry or forfeiture was not enforceable and the lease was not validly terminated on that basis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Corporations List / Final Hearing (principal Judgment)
- Outcome
- Lease termination by the First Defendant was ineffective; no order for possession was made; costs reserved; application for possession adjourned for further directions.
- Legal Topics
- ['lease Termination' 'notice to Remedy Breach' 'forfeiture of Lease' 'reasonable Time to Remedy Breach' 'registration of Lease' 'specific Performance' 'relief Against Forfeiture']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Corporations List / Final Hearing (principal Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Fearndale validly terminated the lease by notice pursuant to s 129 of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)' 'Whether Drama Unit was in breach of covenant in failing to obtain regulatory approvals under the Mining Act 1992 (NSW) before entering the lease' 'Whether the notice to remedy breach gave a reasonable time for remedying the breach' 'Whether the lease is valid and enforceable' 'Whether specific performance or injunctive relief should be granted as to registration of the lease']
Ratio Decidendi
The termination of the lease by Fearndale was ineffective because the notice given to Drama Unit to remedy the breach (failure to obtain mining authority) did not allow a 'reasonable time' as required by s 129 of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW); thus, the right of re-entry or forfeiture was not enforceable and the lease was not validly terminated on that basis.
Court Disposition
Lease termination by the First Defendant was ineffective; no order for possession was made; costs reserved; application for possession adjourned for further directions.
Orders
- ['Paragraph 9 of the Amended Summons filed 29 November 2018 be stood over to the Corporations Directions List at 10am on 4 February 2019.' 'Costs be reserved.' "The parties have liberty to restore, for directions only, on two business days' notice."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment