Draybi One Pty Ltd v Norms Carpentry & Joinery Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1676
The contract provision concerning progress payments did not determine a date on which a claim for a progress payment could be made under s 8(2)(a). If s 8(2)(b) applied, the only possible reference date was the last day of the month in which Norms last did work, being July 2012 or August 2012, and no reference date arose after 31 August 2012. Because the Second Payment Claim was identical to the First Payment Claim, claimed the same amount for the same work, and related to the same reference date, s 13(5) precluded its service.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Proceedings Seeking a Declaration That an Adjudication Determination Under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 Is Void for Want of Jurisdiction / Determination of Separate Questions Pursuant to R 28.2 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
- Outcome
- Separate questions answered: (1) No; (2) No; (3) Yes.
- Legal Topics
- ['separate Questions' 'building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999' 'reference Date' 'payment Claim' 'adjudication Jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Proceedings Seeking a Declaration That an Adjudication Determination Under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 Is Void for Want of Jurisdiction / Determination of Separate Questions Pursuant to R 28.2 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether, on the proper construction of the contract, a reference date after 31 August 2012 was determined under the contract as provided in s 8(2)(a) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999.' 'If the contract made no express provision with respect to reference dates such that s 8(2)(b) applied, whether there was a reference date after 31 August 2012.' 'Whether Norms Carpentry & Joinery Pty Limited was precluded under s 13(5) of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 from serving its payment claim dated 23 July 2013.']
Ratio Decidendi
The contract provision concerning progress payments did not determine a date on which a claim for a progress payment could be made under s 8(2)(a). If s 8(2)(b) applied, the only possible reference date was the last day of the month in which Norms last did work, being July 2012 or August 2012, and no reference date arose after 31 August 2012. Because the Second Payment Claim was identical to the First Payment Claim, claimed the same amount for the same work, and related to the same reference date, s 13(5) precluded its service.
Court Disposition
Separate questions answered: (1) No; (2) No; (3) Yes.
Orders
- ['Question 1 answered: No.' 'Question 2 answered: No.' 'Question 3 answered: Yes.' 'The Court will hear submissions as to the future conduct of the case.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment