Drem Pty Limited v LRL (AUST) Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 1422
The royalty obligation under the 1994 Royalty Deed, as assumed by LRL in the 2020 Deed, is to be calculated as a 2% royalty on the Gross Proceeds of Saleable Product attributable to LRL's 100% interest in the Kathleen Valley tenements. The language of the earlier deed was sufficiently broad to encompass all interests in the relevant tenements (not limited to prior joint venture interests), and the 2020 Deed did not evidence any intention to restrict LRL's liability to less than its entire interest.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Drem Pty Limited; Defendant: LRL (AUST) Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Contractual Dispute – Construction and Interpretation of Royalty Obligations / Judgment After Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Declarations made in favour of Plaintiff, costs awarded to Plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Royalty Agreements, Deeds – Construction and Assignment, Mining Tenement Interests
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Drem Pty Limited
Plaintiff
LRL (AUST) Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contractual Dispute – Construction and Interpretation of Royalty Obligations / Judgment After Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 How is the royalty obligation in the 1994 Royalty Deed to be calculated for the Kathleen Valley tenements now owned 100% by LRL?
- 2 Does the obligation apply only to the proportion held by XNAO (87.15%) at joint venture cessation, or to the entirety now held by LRL (100%)?
- 3 What is the effect of the 2020 Deed of Acknowledgement between Drem and LRL on the scope of royalty liability?
Ratio Decidendi
The royalty obligation under the 1994 Royalty Deed, as assumed by LRL in the 2020 Deed, is to be calculated as a 2% royalty on the Gross Proceeds of Saleable Product attributable to LRL's 100% interest in the Kathleen Valley tenements. The language of the earlier deed was sufficiently broad to encompass all interests in the relevant tenements (not limited to prior joint venture interests), and the 2020 Deed did not evidence any intention to restrict LRL's liability to less than its entire interest.
Court Disposition
Declarations made in favour of Plaintiff, costs awarded to Plaintiff
Orders
- Declare Defendant is the 100% holder of the relevant mining tenements.
- Declare Defendant is obliged to pay a non-bullion royalty under the 1994 Deed and 2020 Deed to Plaintiff, calculated as 2% of Gross Proceeds of Saleable Product from the Defendant's 100% interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment