Dreric Pty Limited v North Sydney Council [2022] NSWLEC 1005
As the amended development application and the terms of agreement satisfy the statutory preconditions for consent—including heritage, planning, sustainability, contamination, and infrastructure controls—the Court is required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to make orders in accordance with the parties' conciliation agreement and approve the DA subject to agreed conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 January 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (class 1) / Post Conciliation, Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld, development application approved subject to conditions, costs order made
- Legal Topics
- ['development Applications' 'heritage Conservation' 'conciliation Procedures' 'court Powers on Appeal' 'costs in Planning Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal (class 1) / Post Conciliation, Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the amended development application for alterations and additions to a heritage item and use as a dwelling with medical consulting rooms should be approved under planning and heritage controls' 'Whether the agreement reached at conciliation conference can be approved by the Court under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979' 'Whether costs are payable after amendment of the DA']
Ratio Decidendi
As the amended development application and the terms of agreement satisfy the statutory preconditions for consent—including heritage, planning, sustainability, contamination, and infrastructure controls—the Court is required by s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 to make orders in accordance with the parties' conciliation agreement and approve the DA subject to agreed conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld, development application approved subject to conditions, costs order made
Orders
- ['The previous costs order of 24 September 2021 is vacated.' "The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as a result of the amendment to the DA." 'The appeal is upheld.' "The heritage management document 'Heritage...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment