DRG17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1228
The appellant failed to identify any appealable error or jurisdictional error in the decision of the primary judge or the Authority. The Authority considered all claims and evidence, applied the correct law, and acted within jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed with costs to follow the event.
- Parties
- Appellant: DRG17; First Respondent: Minister for Home Affairs; Second Respondent: Immigration Assessment Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Jurisdictional Error, Safe Haven Enterprise Visa, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DRG17
Appellant
Minister for Home Affairs
First Respondent
Immigration Assessment Authority
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority fell into jurisdictional error in affirming refusal of a safe haven enterprise visa
- 2 Whether the primary judge erred in dismissing the application for judicial review
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to identify any appealable error or jurisdictional error in the decision of the primary judge or the Authority. The Authority considered all claims and evidence, applied the correct law, and acted within jurisdiction. The appeal was dismissed with costs to follow the event.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The appellant is to pay the first respondent's costs to be assessed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment