R v Teoh [2020] NSWDC 745

R v Teoh [2020] NSWDC 745

Given the offender's plea of guilty, lack of prior convictions, young age, remorse, and circumstances of offending for financial gain during hardship, together with the objective seriousness being lower end though not minimal, a total sentence of 2 years and 1 month imprisonment (with a non-parole period of 1 year) is appropriate, with special circumstances justified in fixing the non-parole period.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Outcome
The offender is convicted and sentenced to a term of 2 years and 1 month imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 1 year.
Legal Topics
['drug Offences' 'cultivation of Prohibited Plants' 'sentencing']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentence

  1. 1 ['appropriate sentence for knowingly taking part in cultivation of a commercial quantity of prohibited plants' 'whether special circumstances should be found in fixing non-parole period']

Ratio Decidendi

Given the offender's plea of guilty, lack of prior convictions, young age, remorse, and circumstances of offending for financial gain during hardship, together with the objective seriousness being lower end though not minimal, a total sentence of 2 years and 1 month imprisonment (with a non-parole period of 1 year) is appropriate, with special circumstances justified in fixing the non-parole period.

Court Disposition

The offender is convicted and sentenced to a term of 2 years and 1 month imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 1 year.

Orders

  • ['The offender is sentenced to a term of 2 years and 1 month imprisonment and a non-parole period of 1 year.']