R v Kaddour (No 3) [2019] NSWDC 737
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt any of the offences as it did not establish that the reference sample used for DNA comparison was obtained from the accused, and therefore, insufficient evidence existed to link the accused to the Berkeley Vale premises and the alleged drug activities.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judge Alone Trial, Verdict
- Outcome
- not guilty on all counts
- Legal Topics
- ['drug Offences' 'evidence' 'tendency Evidence' 'coincidence Evidence' 'dna Evidence' 'burden of Proof']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judge Alone Trial, Verdict
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the accused produced prohibited drugs in large commercial quantities' 'Whether the accused supplied prohibited drugs in large commercial quantities' 'Whether the DNA evidence sufficiently links the accused to the offences' "Whether tendency and coincidence evidence establish the accused's participation" "Whether the prosecution proved the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt"]
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt any of the offences as it did not establish that the reference sample used for DNA comparison was obtained from the accused, and therefore, insufficient evidence existed to link the accused to the Berkeley Vale premises and the alleged drug activities.
Court Disposition
not guilty on all counts
Orders
- ['Verdict of not guilty on count 1' 'Verdict of not guilty on count 2' 'Verdict of not guilty on count 3' 'Verdict of not guilty on count 4' 'Verdict of not guilty on count 5']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment