DSJ v Children’s Guardian [2019] NSWCATAD 168
On all the evidence, including the extended period since the offence, lack of any similar offending, consistent psychological opinions of low risk, positive rehabilitative steps, and a neutral position by the Children's Guardian, the Tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that DSJ no longer poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children, has rebutted the presumption of risk under section 28(7), and that a reasonable person would permit their child to have unsupervised contact with DSJ in the relevant context; it is therefore appropriate and in the public interest to grant the enabling order and clearance.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Hearing and Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application for enabling order granted; declaration made that DSJ is not a disqualified person; Children's Guardian to grant Working with Children Check clearance.
- Legal Topics
- ['working With Children Check' 'disqualification Under Child Protection Legislation' 'risk Assessment for Child Safety' 'tribunal Review of Administrative Decisions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Hearing and Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether DSJ, with a disqualifying offence, poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children for the purpose of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW)' 'Whether an enabling order should be granted under section 28 of the Act, declaring DSJ is not to be treated as a disqualified person' 'Whether a reasonable person would allow unsupervised contact with DSJ in child-related work and if granting a clearance is in the public interest']
Ratio Decidendi
On all the evidence, including the extended period since the offence, lack of any similar offending, consistent psychological opinions of low risk, positive rehabilitative steps, and a neutral position by the Children's Guardian, the Tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that DSJ no longer poses a real and appreciable risk to the safety of children, has rebutted the presumption of risk under section 28(7), and that a reasonable person would permit their child to have unsupervised contact with DSJ in the relevant context; it is therefore appropriate and in the public interest to grant the enabling order and clearance.
Court Disposition
Application for enabling order granted; declaration made that DSJ is not a disqualified person; Children's Guardian to grant Working with Children Check clearance.
Orders
- ['It is declared DSJ is not a disqualified person for the purposes of section 28(1) of Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW) for the offence of assault on a person under 16 years with an act of indecency contrary to s 61E(1A) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) entered on 21 June 1990 at the Parramatta Local...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment