DSM v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2019] NSWCATAD 193
The Tribunal determined that, taking into account the evidence of MSD's current needs, consistent wishes to downsize, available expert, financial and medical evidence, and considering the paramount importance of MSD's welfare and interests under s39 of the Act, the sale of the Family Home and the purchase of a suitable apartment for MSD up to $1 million is the correct and preferable decision. This arrangement best meets MSD's accommodation, care, and financial needs.
- Parties
- Applicant: DSM; First Respondent: NSW Trustee and Guardian; Second Respondent: DUA; Third Respondent: DUB
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Application for review allowed; decision set aside; orders made for sale and purchase.
- Legal Topics
- Review Under NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009, Financial Management Order, Interests and Welfare of Protected Person, Whether to Sell Property of Protected Person
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DSM
Applicant
NSW Trustee and Guardian
First Respondent
DUA
Second Respondent
DUB
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision to not sell the Family Home was correct and preferable
- 2 Whether sale of the Family Home is in the interests and welfare of MSD
- 3 Appropriate consideration of protected person’s wishes and needs under s39 of the NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal determined that, taking into account the evidence of MSD's current needs, consistent wishes to downsize, available expert, financial and medical evidence, and considering the paramount importance of MSD's welfare and interests under s39 of the Act, the sale of the Family Home and the purchase of a suitable apartment for MSD up to $1 million is the correct and preferable decision. This arrangement best meets MSD's accommodation, care, and financial needs.
Court Disposition
Application for review allowed; decision set aside; orders made for sale and purchase.
Orders
- Leave is granted for DSM to file the application seeking administrative review of the decision made by the first respondent on 21 December 2018 to 7 February 2019.
- The decision of the first respondent made on 21 December 2018 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment