DSM Nutritional Products, LLC v Suntory Holdings Limited [2013] FCA 474
The research and development documents of the respondent are at best of secondary relevance to the issues in the proceeding, do not address the common general knowledge in Australia, have not been sought previously in proceedings before the Commissioner of Patents, and ordering such discovery would be disproportionate given the evidence of difficulties in procuring those documents.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Discovery / Determination of Discovery Application
- Outcome
- Application for discovery refused; costs awarded to respondent
- Legal Topics
- ['discovery' 'patent Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Discovery / Determination of Discovery Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether discovery of the research and development documents of Suntory Holdings Limited should be ordered']
Ratio Decidendi
The research and development documents of the respondent are at best of secondary relevance to the issues in the proceeding, do not address the common general knowledge in Australia, have not been sought previously in proceedings before the Commissioner of Patents, and ordering such discovery would be disproportionate given the evidence of difficulties in procuring those documents.
Court Disposition
Application for discovery refused; costs awarded to respondent
Orders
- ["The application made by DSM Nutritional Products, LLC for discovery of Suntory Holding Limited's research and development documents is refused." "DMS Nutritional Products, LLC pay Suntory Holding Limited's costs of the application for discovery."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment