Environment Protection Authority v Dubbo City Council [2000] NSWLEC 78
Taking into account the potential (though not actual) environmental harm, the defendant's reasonable foreseeability and control of the risk, its prior conviction, its guilty plea, ongoing cooperation, remedial actions, and the amount of comparable penalties, the appropriate penalty for this pollution offence is a conviction, a fine of $15,000, and costs of $5,500.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution / Sentence
- Outcome
- Defendant convicted of the offence charged; fined $15,000; ordered to pay $5,500 in costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['water Pollution' 'sentencing' 'mitigation' 'environmental Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Prosecution / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate penalty for unauthorised pollution of waters contrary to s 16(1) of the Clean Waters Act 1970' 'Extent and foreseeability of environmental harm' 'Mitigating and aggravating circumstances relevant to penalty']
Ratio Decidendi
Taking into account the potential (though not actual) environmental harm, the defendant's reasonable foreseeability and control of the risk, its prior conviction, its guilty plea, ongoing cooperation, remedial actions, and the amount of comparable penalties, the appropriate penalty for this pollution offence is a conviction, a fine of $15,000, and costs of $5,500.
Court Disposition
Defendant convicted of the offence charged; fined $15,000; ordered to pay $5,500 in costs.
Orders
- ['The defendant is convicted of the offence with which it is charged.' 'The defendant is fined the sum of $15,000 to be paid to the Registrar of the Court within one month.' 'The defendant must pay the costs of the prosecutor in the amount of $5,500.' 'The exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment