REGINA v. PHAM [2001] NSWCCA 101

REGINA v. PHAM [2001] NSWCCA 101

No error by the sentencing judge is established; the sentence was properly imposed having regard to the applicant's criminality, seriousness of offences, and subjective circumstances. Sentencing principles relating to discount, minimum terms, and post-sentence circumstances were correctly applied.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed
Legal Topics
['sentence' 'sentence Appeal']
['criminal Law'] ['sentence' 'sentence Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'Whether proper weight was given to guilty plea, subjective circumstances, and post-sentence events']

Ratio Decidendi

No error by the sentencing judge is established; the sentence was properly imposed having regard to the applicant's criminality, seriousness of offences, and subjective circumstances. Sentencing principles relating to discount, minimum terms, and post-sentence circumstances were correctly applied.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed

Orders

  • ['Dismiss the application for leave to appeal']