Dudley Mark Aslett v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 86
The Court had misstated the non-parole period it intended to impose for counts 5, 6 and 7 in its judgment of 24 March 2006, so it vacated the prior substituting order and imposed the intended sentences for those counts.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Order Correcting Substituted Sentences
- Outcome
- Vacate the order substituting sentences on counts 5, 6 and 7 and impose corrected sentences on those counts.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'non Parole Period' 'correction of Sentencing Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Order Correcting Substituted Sentences
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the order substituting sentences on counts 5, 6 and 7 should be vacated because the Court misstated the non-parole period it intended to impose.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court had misstated the non-parole period it intended to impose for counts 5, 6 and 7 in its judgment of 24 March 2006, so it vacated the prior substituting order and imposed the intended sentences for those counts.
Court Disposition
Vacate the order substituting sentences on counts 5, 6 and 7 and impose corrected sentences on those counts.
Orders
- ['Vacate the order substituting sentences on counts 5, 6 and 7.' 'Order that the following sentences be and are imposed on counts 5, 6 and 7: On each count a non-parole period of eight years and six months commencing on 22 August 2017 and expiring on 21 February 2026 and a balance of term of seven years and six...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment