Allan, D.N. v. The National Companies & Securities Commission & Anor [1986] FCA 202
A decision under s.417(6)(b) of the Companies (Western Australia) Code is a decision made in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred on the Commission by a State Act, and is thus excluded from review under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 by virtue of Schedule 1 para.(m).
- Parties
- Applicant: Dudley Norman Allan; First Respondent: The National Companies and Securities Commission; Second Respondent: Alan Davidson Smith (as Commissioner for Corporate Affairs)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Objection to Competency Preliminary Matter
- Outcome
- Objection to competency allowed; application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Administrative Decisions, Winding Up of Companies, Disqualification of Liquidators, Interaction of Federal and State Legislation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dudley Norman Allan
Applicant
The National Companies and Securities Commission
First Respondent
Alan Davidson Smith (as Commissioner for Corporate Affairs)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Objection to Competency Preliminary Matter
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a direction under s.417(6)(b) of the Companies (Western Australia) Code is a decision to which the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 applies
- 2 Whether such a decision is excluded by Schedule 1 para.(m) of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act
Ratio Decidendi
A decision under s.417(6)(b) of the Companies (Western Australia) Code is a decision made in the performance of a function or the exercise of a power conferred on the Commission by a State Act, and is thus excluded from review under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 by virtue of Schedule 1 para.(m).
Court Disposition
Objection to competency allowed; application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The objection to competency is allowed.
- The application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment