Regina v Dumitru Lefter [1999] NSWCCA 305
The sentencing judge dealt clearly and sufficiently with all relevant objective and subjective matters, including the objective seriousness of the heroin supply offences, the applicant's prior drug conviction and generally bad record, and the subjective material concerning alcohol abuse. No cause was shown for appellate intervention, so the appeal was dismissed after leave was granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed; recommendation for deportation.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'supply of Prohibited Drug' 'heroin' 'drug Trafficking' 'deportation Recommendation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence / Court of Criminal Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal against sentence should be granted.' 'Whether the sentences imposed for supplying heroin warranted appellate intervention.' "Whether the applicant's role as a middleman and his subjective circumstances justified a lesser sentence."]
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge dealt clearly and sufficiently with all relevant objective and subjective matters, including the objective seriousness of the heroin supply offences, the applicant's prior drug conviction and generally bad record, and the subjective material concerning alcohol abuse. No cause was shown for appellate intervention, so the appeal was dismissed after leave was granted.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed; recommendation for deportation.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.' 'Recommendation for deportation.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment