Duncan v Vizzard [1935] HCA 43
The special conditions of licences issued under the State Transport (Co-ordination) Act 1931 (N.S.W.) do not authorize journeys competitive with railways beyond fifty miles and such limitations do not infringe the freedom of interstate trade and commerce guaranteed by section 92 of the Commonwealth Constitution; there is no implied authority to travel beyond fifty miles in competition with railways subject only to a charge, and the Board's powers and exemptions are strictly as granted by statute and expressed conditions.
- Parties
- Appellant: Duncan; Appellant: Green Star Trading Company Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Meera; Informant: Frederick William Vizzard
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appellate Review (high Court, Case Stated Removed From Court of Criminal Appeal of Nsw)
- Outcome
- Conviction upheld; appeal dismissed; constitutional challenge rejected by majority.
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Trade, Commerce and Intercourse, Licensing of Public Motor Vehicles, Competition With Railways, State Regulatory Power
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Duncan
Appellant
Green Star Trading Company Proprietary Limited
Appellant
Meera
Respondent
Frederick William Vizzard
Informant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appellate Review (high Court, Case Stated Removed From Court of Criminal Appeal of Nsw)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conditions in licences under State Transport (Co-ordination) Act 1931 (N.S.W.), limiting competitive journeys with railways to fifty miles, contravene section 92 of the Commonwealth Constitution
- 2 Whether the grant and form of the permit or exemption under the Act authorizes competitive journeys beyond fifty miles
- 3 Interpretation of special conditions attached to motor vehicle licences
Ratio Decidendi
The special conditions of licences issued under the State Transport (Co-ordination) Act 1931 (N.S.W.) do not authorize journeys competitive with railways beyond fifty miles and such limitations do not infringe the freedom of interstate trade and commerce guaranteed by section 92 of the Commonwealth Constitution; there is no implied authority to travel beyond fifty miles in competition with railways subject only to a charge, and the Board's powers and exemptions are strictly as granted by statute and expressed conditions.
Court Disposition
Conviction upheld; appeal dismissed; constitutional challenge rejected by majority.
Orders
- Cases remitted to the Court of Quarter Sessions to be dealt with in accordance with the High Court's answers to the stated questions.
- Costs to be paid by the defendants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment