DUQ16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2020] FCA 301
None of the grounds sought to be agitated by the applicant for an extension of time and leave to appeal were found to have arguable merit, and the IAA had adequately considered the relevant issues raised including discrimination and surety upon return to Sri Lanka; accordingly, the application was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: DUQ16; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Immigration Assessment Authority
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Judicial Review, Jurisdictional Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DUQ16
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Immigration Assessment Authority
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time for leave to appeal
- 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Circuit Court decision
- 3 Whether the Immigration Assessment Authority failed to consider relevant matters in its decision
Ratio Decidendi
None of the grounds sought to be agitated by the applicant for an extension of time and leave to appeal were found to have arguable merit, and the IAA had adequately considered the relevant issues raised including discrimination and surety upon return to Sri Lanka; accordingly, the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal filed on 17 June 2019 is dismissed.
- The applicant pay the costs of the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection of and incidental to the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment