LANG, Dylan Craig v R [2013] NSWCCA 29

LANG, Dylan Craig v R [2013] NSWCCA 29

The sentence imposed on the applicant was not manifestly excessive given the objective seriousness of the offences and the applicant's extensive criminal history; any disparity with the co-offender's sentence was justified by significant differences in their personal circumstances, including criminal records, and did not give rise to a justifiable sense of grievance.

Parties
Applicant: Dylan Craig Lang; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 February 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Determination
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Sentence Appeal, Manifestly Excessive, Parity Principle, Concurrency of Sentences, Justifiable Sense of Grievance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dylan Craig Lang

Applicant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Determination

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant was manifestly excessive.
  2. 2 Whether there was a justifiable sense of grievance arising from disparity with the co-offender's sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed on the applicant was not manifestly excessive given the objective seriousness of the offences and the applicant's extensive criminal history; any disparity with the co-offender's sentence was justified by significant differences in their personal circumstances, including criminal records, and did not give rise to a justifiable sense of grievance.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted.
  • Appeal dismissed.