LANG, Dylan Craig v R [2013] NSWCCA 29
The sentence imposed on the applicant was not manifestly excessive given the objective seriousness of the offences and the applicant's extensive criminal history; any disparity with the co-offender's sentence was justified by significant differences in their personal circumstances, including criminal records, and did not give rise to a justifiable sense of grievance.
- Parties
- Applicant: Dylan Craig Lang; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Determination
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Appeal, Manifestly Excessive, Parity Principle, Concurrency of Sentences, Justifiable Sense of Grievance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dylan Craig Lang
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant was manifestly excessive.
- 2 Whether there was a justifiable sense of grievance arising from disparity with the co-offender's sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed on the applicant was not manifestly excessive given the objective seriousness of the offences and the applicant's extensive criminal history; any disparity with the co-offender's sentence was justified by significant differences in their personal circumstances, including criminal records, and did not give rise to a justifiable sense of grievance.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment