Hedges v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 263

Hedges v Regina [2011] NSWCCA 263

Beazley JA held that the only reasonable inference from the evidence was that the appellant was conscious and made a deliberate decision to overtake across double lines, constituting dangerous driving under s 52A(1)(c) of the Crimes Act 1900; Fullerton J dissented, finding that it was reasonably open on the evidence that the appellant was asleep when his vehicle crossed the lines and that an inference consistent with innocence was open. The majority dismissed the conviction appeal as not unreasonable but allowed the sentence appeal, finding the sentencing judge erred in applying the guideline judgment prescriptively and that a lower custodial sentence was appropriate based on the absence...

Parties
Appellant: Dylan Joseph Hedges; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 December 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; Leave to appeal against sentence granted; Appeal against sentence allowed; Sentence of 3 years 7 months quashed; Appellant resentenced to imprisonment: non-parole period 15 months from 4 November 2010 to 3 February 2012, with an additional 15 months ending 3 May 2013, release on...
Legal Topics
Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence, Dangerous Driving Occasioning Death, Guideline Judgment, Sentencing Discretion, Unreasonable Verdict
Criminal Law Appeal Against Conviction Appeal Against Sentence Dangerous Driving Occasioning Death Guideline Judgment Sentencing Discretion Unreasonable Verdict

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dylan Joseph Hedges

Appellant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the verdict was unreasonable or could not be supported having regard to the evidence
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge misapplied the guideline judgment in Regina v Whyte [2002] NSWCCA 343

Ratio Decidendi

Beazley JA held that the only reasonable inference from the evidence was that the appellant was conscious and made a deliberate decision to overtake across double lines, constituting dangerous driving under s 52A(1)(c) of the Crimes Act 1900; Fullerton J dissented, finding that it was reasonably open on the evidence that the appellant was asleep when his vehicle crossed the lines and that an inference consistent with innocence was open. The majority dismissed the conviction appeal as not unreasonable but allowed the sentence appeal, finding the sentencing judge erred in applying the guideline judgment prescriptively and that a lower custodial sentence was appropriate based on the absence...

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; Leave to appeal against sentence granted; Appeal against sentence allowed; Sentence of 3 years 7 months quashed; Appellant resentenced to imprisonment: non-parole period 15 months from 4 November 2010 to 3 February 2012, with an additional 15 months ending 3 May 2013, release on...

Orders

  • Appeal against conviction dismissed
  • Grant leave to appeal against sentence