DZAEH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 83
The application for extension of time was refused because the applicant's proposed grounds of appeal had no real or realistic prospects of success, particularly as the Tribunal had addressed the privacy breach and the applicant could not demonstrate any jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's approach.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'privacy Breach' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether an extension of time to appeal from the Federal Circuit Court's dismissal of judicial review should be granted" 'Whether the proposed grounds of appeal have real or realistic prospects of success' "Whether a privacy breach by the Department affected the applicant's case" "Whether the Tribunal's handling of the privacy breach involved jurisdictional error"]
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time was refused because the applicant's proposed grounds of appeal had no real or realistic prospects of success, particularly as the Tribunal had addressed the privacy breach and the applicant could not demonstrate any jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's approach.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time dismissed
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time filed on 19 January 2016 be dismissed.' 'The order made on 19 January 2016 restraining the first respondent from removing the applicant from Australia pursuant to s 198 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) be discharged.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment