DZAEH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 83

DZAEH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 83

The application for extension of time was refused because the applicant's proposed grounds of appeal had no real or realistic prospects of success, particularly as the Tribunal had addressed the privacy breach and the applicant could not demonstrate any jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's approach.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application for extension of time dismissed
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'privacy Breach' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 ["Whether an extension of time to appeal from the Federal Circuit Court's dismissal of judicial review should be granted" 'Whether the proposed grounds of appeal have real or realistic prospects of success' "Whether a privacy breach by the Department affected the applicant's case" "Whether the Tribunal's handling of the privacy breach involved jurisdictional error"]

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time was refused because the applicant's proposed grounds of appeal had no real or realistic prospects of success, particularly as the Tribunal had addressed the privacy breach and the applicant could not demonstrate any jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's approach.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application for an extension of time filed on 19 January 2016 be dismissed.' 'The order made on 19 January 2016 restraining the first respondent from removing the applicant from Australia pursuant to s 198 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) be discharged.']