DZAFH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 984
The Tribunal had no jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision as the application for review was not lodged in the approved form with the Tribunal within the prescribed time under s 412(1)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) and reg. 4.31 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth); therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: DZAFH; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Visa Application Review, Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Time Limits for Application, Judicial Review Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DZAFH
Appellant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal had jurisdiction to review the delegate’s decision if the application for review was not lodged within the prescribed time
- 2 Whether the application was received in the prescribed form within the statutory period
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal had no jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision as the application for review was not lodged in the approved form with the Tribunal within the prescribed time under s 412(1)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) and reg. 4.31 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth); therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed.
- The Appellant pay the First Respondent's costs fixed in the amount of $3,000.00.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment