SafeWork NSW v E G Knight & Sons Pty Ltd [2019] NSWDC 336
E G Knight & Sons Pty Ltd breached s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 by failing to ensure, as far as reasonably practicable, the health and safety of its workers, leading to exposure to risk of serious injury. The risk was foreseeable, basic risk assessment and compliance with guidance materials would have identified and prevented it. The penalty reflects the objective seriousness, relevant deterrence needs, mitigating factors including plea and cooperation, and the defendant’s limited capacity to pay.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: SafeWork New South Wales; Defendant: E G Knight & Sons Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- convicted
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Employers, Health and Safety Duty, Risk Management, Workplace Injury, Foreseeability, Deterrence, Capacity to Pay, Objective Seriousness of Offence, Plea of Guilty, Unguarded Farm Machinery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SafeWork New South Wales
Prosecutor
E G Knight & Sons Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant failed to comply with health and safety duty under s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 resulting in exposure of workers to risk of death or serious injury
- 2 Appropriate sentencing for breach of workplace health and safety obligations
- 3 Consideration of objective seriousness, deterrence, aggravating and mitigating factors, and the defendant's capacity to pay
Ratio Decidendi
E G Knight & Sons Pty Ltd breached s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 by failing to ensure, as far as reasonably practicable, the health and safety of its workers, leading to exposure to risk of serious injury. The risk was foreseeable, basic risk assessment and compliance with guidance materials would have identified and prevented it. The penalty reflects the objective seriousness, relevant deterrence needs, mitigating factors including plea and cooperation, and the defendant’s limited capacity to pay.
Court Disposition
convicted
Orders
- Defendant is convicted.
- Appropriate fine would be $100,000, reduced by 25% for early guilty plea and further discounted due to limited capacity to pay; fine imposed is $5,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment