Eastern Basin Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia [1999] NSWSC 231
Because there exists a real, albeit not necessarily strong, argument as to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction and urgent facilities are available in the Federal Court, the interests of justice require the proceedings be transferred to the Federal Court of Australia, New South Wales District Registry.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Transfer Application Prior to Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- proceedings transferred
- Legal Topics
- ['cross Vesting' 'jurisdiction' 'transfer of Proceedings' 'urgent Interlocutory Relief']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Transfer Application Prior to Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Supreme Court of NSW has jurisdiction to deal with proceedings pursuant to s414 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)' 'Whether proceedings should be transferred to the Federal Court of Australia under the Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross Vesting) Act 1987']
Ratio Decidendi
Because there exists a real, albeit not necessarily strong, argument as to the Supreme Court's jurisdiction and urgent facilities are available in the Federal Court, the interests of justice require the proceedings be transferred to the Federal Court of Australia, New South Wales District Registry.
Court Disposition
proceedings transferred
Orders
- ['Proceedings 1254/99 in the Equity Division of this Court be transferred to the Federal Court of Australia, New South Wales District Registry.' 'Costs of today are reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment