SafeWork NSW v Easy Fall Guttering Pty Limited [2021] NSWDC 44
Easy Fall Guttering Pty Limited was in breach of its statutory duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) by failing to ensure health and safety so far as reasonably practicable, failing to notify SafeWork NSW of a notifiable incident, and failing to consult, co-operate, and co-ordinate with other duty holders. The seriousness of the foreseeable risks and failure to implement readily available control measures justified significant penalties, subject to a 25% reduction for early guilty plea, and considerations of the defendant's capacity to pay did not warrant any further reduction.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: SafeWork NSW; Defendant: Easy Fall Guttering Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- conviction and fines imposed
- Legal Topics
- Failure to Comply With Duty, Workplace Injury, Failure to Notify Regulator, Failure to Consult and Coordinate, Sentencing, General Deterrence, Specific Deterrence, Parity, Capacity to Pay
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SafeWork NSW
Prosecutor
Easy Fall Guttering Pty Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Did the defendant fail to comply with its WHS duty to ensure the health and safety of workers under s 19(1) of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)?
- 2 Did the defendant fail to notify SafeWork NSW of a notifiable incident as required under s 38 of the Act?
- 3 Did the defendant fail to consult, co-operate, and coordinate with other duty holders in breach of s 46 of the Act?
Ratio Decidendi
Easy Fall Guttering Pty Limited was in breach of its statutory duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) by failing to ensure health and safety so far as reasonably practicable, failing to notify SafeWork NSW of a notifiable incident, and failing to consult, co-operate, and co-ordinate with other duty holders. The seriousness of the foreseeable risks and failure to implement readily available control measures justified significant penalties, subject to a 25% reduction for early guilty plea, and considerations of the defendant's capacity to pay did not warrant any further reduction.
Court Disposition
conviction and fines imposed
Orders
- The defendant is convicted.
- For the s 19 offence, a fine of $300,000 reduced by 25% for early plea; final fine $225,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment