Johnson v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church & Anor [2009] NSWSC 309

Johnson v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church & Anor [2009] NSWSC 309

The Court ordered liability to be heard separately because the plaintiff's liability case was complete, there was a clear demarcation and almost no overlap between liability and quantum evidence apart from diagnosis, the liability evidence concerned events in July 1998 and further delay would impair recollections and the likelihood of a fair trial, while quantum evidence was incomplete and would substantially delay the hearing. Separate determination would significantly facilitate the just, quick and cheap resolution of the matter.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 April 2009
Procedural Posture
Practice and Procedure; Application for Separate Hearing on Liability / Defendants' Motion Under UCPR 28.2
Outcome
Defendants' application granted; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendants' costs of the motion.
Legal Topics
['separate Determination of Liability and Quantum' 'case Management' 'overriding Purpose' 'duty of Care, Breach and Causation' 'costs of Motion']
['civil Procedure' 'negligence'] ['separate Determination of Liability and Quantum' 'case Management' 'overriding Purpose' 'duty of Care, Breach and Causation' 'costs of Motion']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Practice and Procedure; Application for Separate Hearing on Liability / Defendants' Motion Under UCPR 28.2

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the question of the defendants' liability, including whether any negligence caused damage, should be decided separately from quantum under UCPR 28.2." 'Whether separate determination would facilitate the just, quick and cheap resolution of the real issues in the proceedings.' 'Whether there was sufficient demarcation between liability evidence and quantum evidence to justify separate hearings.' 'Whether delay in determining liability would adversely affect the likelihood of a fair trial.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court ordered liability to be heard separately because the plaintiff's liability case was complete, there was a clear demarcation and almost no overlap between liability and quantum evidence apart from diagnosis, the liability evidence concerned events in July 1998 and further delay would impair recollections and the likelihood of a fair trial, while quantum evidence was incomplete and would substantially delay the hearing. Separate determination would significantly facilitate the just, quick and cheap resolution of the matter.

Court Disposition

Defendants' application granted; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendants' costs of the motion.

Orders

  • ["That pursuant to UCPR 28.2, the question of the defendants' liability (including the question of whether any negligence on the part of either defendant caused any damage) be decided separately from the question of quantum." "I order the plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs of this motion."]