EBT17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 200

EBT17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 200

Leave to appeal was refused because the proposed grounds were not sufficiently arguable. The Tribunal's reasons, read as a whole, disclosed multiple articulated credibility concerns and reasons for rejecting the applicant's claims, including inconsistencies and late-advanced claims. The Federal Circuit Court did not relevantly err in understanding or addressing the Tribunal's credibility findings, and there was no arguable failure by the Tribunal to give reasons.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 February 2019
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Review of Tribunal's Decision Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa Application / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'tribunal Reasons' 'credibility Findings' 'jurisdictional Error' 'leave to Appeal']
['migration' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'tribunal Reasons' 'credibility Findings' 'jurisdictional Error' 'leave to Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Review of Tribunal's Decision Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa Application / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Circuit Court's dismissal of the applicant's judicial review application." 'Whether the Tribunal failed to give reasons or particularise reasons for finding that the applicant was not generally credible.' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to give reasons or particularise reasons for finding that the applicant was not a truthful witness.' "Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in its treatment of the applicant's proposed grounds concerning the Tribunal's reasons and credibility findings."]

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the proposed grounds were not sufficiently arguable. The Tribunal's reasons, read as a whole, disclosed multiple articulated credibility concerns and reasons for rejecting the applicant's claims, including inconsistencies and late-advanced claims. The Federal Circuit Court did not relevantly err in understanding or addressing the Tribunal's credibility findings, and there was no arguable failure by the Tribunal to give reasons.

Court Disposition

The application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application for leave to appeal be dismissed, with costs.']