EBZ20 v ECA20 [2022] FCA 1098
The appeal failed because none of the alleged errors was established. The allegation of actual bias was without merit. The primary judge was not required to make the requested factual findings where no error of law by the Tribunal had been shown. It was open to the Tribunal to find that both parents expected the children to attend Trinity Grammar School, and the father’s asserted condition about who would pay the fees did not negate the s 117(2)(b)(ii) ground because it concerned payment rather than the manner of education. Once that departure ground was established, the Tribunal was required to consider whether a departure was just and equitable, including the parents’ earning capacities...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Law Appeal Concerning Judicial Review of a Child Support Departure Determination / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Judgment in Oliver V Oliver [2021] FCCA 965 Dismissing an Appeal From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['child Support Assessment' 'departure Determination' 'administrative Appeals Tribunal Appeal on a Question of Law' 'actual Bias' 'fact Finding Under S 44(7) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (cth)' 'earning Capacity' 'just and Equitable Determination']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law Appeal Concerning Judicial Review of a Child Support Departure Determination / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia From the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Judgment in Oliver V Oliver [2021] FCCA 965 Dismissing an Appeal From the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the primary judge was affected by actual bias.' 'Whether the primary judge erred by not making findings of fact under s 44(7) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth).' "Whether a mutual expectation that the children would attend Trinity Grammar School was sufficient to establish the ground for departure in s 117(2)(b)(ii) of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) despite the father's asserted condition that the mother pay the fees." 'Whether the Tribunal wrongly made or affirmed a departure determination as an earning capacity decision on grounds not relied upon by the mother.' 'Whether earning capacity under s 117(4)(da) and s 117(7B) of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989 (Cth) is relevant only to an application relying on s 117(2)(c)(ib).']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal failed because none of the alleged errors was established. The allegation of actual bias was without merit. The primary judge was not required to make the requested factual findings where no error of law by the Tribunal had been shown. It was open to the Tribunal to find that both parents expected the children to attend Trinity Grammar School, and the father’s asserted condition about who would pay the fees did not negate the s 117(2)(b)(ii) ground because it concerned payment rather than the manner of education. Once that departure ground was established, the Tribunal was required to consider whether a departure was just and equitable, including the parents’ earning capacities...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondents' costs of the appeal, to be assessed in default of agreement in accordance with the court's Costs Practice Note (GPN-COSTS)."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment