EC (a pseudonym) v R [2023] NSWCCA 66
The absence of credible, fresh evidence concerning the appellant's clothing on the relevant day occasioned a miscarriage of justice; however, as the complainant has not been examined upon the new evidence and there remains supporting evidence for the prosecution case, the interests of justice require a retrial, not an acquittal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; retrial ordered
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal and Review' 'miscarriage of Justice' 'fresh Evidence' 'conviction Inquiry' 'retrial Discretion']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether absence of evidence from trial and appeal amounted to miscarriage of justice' 'Appropriate relief: acquittal or retrial']
Ratio Decidendi
The absence of credible, fresh evidence concerning the appellant's clothing on the relevant day occasioned a miscarriage of justice; however, as the complainant has not been examined upon the new evidence and there remains supporting evidence for the prosecution case, the interests of justice require a retrial, not an acquittal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; retrial ordered
Orders
- ['Appeal allowed.' "Quash the conviction on Sequence 8 recorded in the Children's Court on 25 January 2016 (and confirmed in the District Court on 8 September 2016)." "Remit the proceedings to the Children's Court for a retrial of Sequence 8." "List the proceedings before the Registrar of the Children's Court for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment