Lippmann v Burwood Council [2007] NSWLEC 126
The revised proposal, with conditions relating to traffic and parking management, acoustic measures, and 12 month trial periods, adequately addresses the key concerns of amenity, traffic, and noise, such that development consent should be granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'traffic Management' 'acoustic Impacts' 'public Interest' 'school Construction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether development consent should be granted for construction of a new junior school at Park Road, Burwood' 'Whether traffic and parking impact is acceptable' 'Whether noise and acoustic impact is acceptable' 'Whether proposal is contrary to public interest']
Ratio Decidendi
The revised proposal, with conditions relating to traffic and parking management, acoustic measures, and 12 month trial periods, adequately addresses the key concerns of amenity, traffic, and noise, such that development consent should be granted.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' "Development consent is granted to DA 326/2005 for demolition of existing structures and construction of new school buildings and associated facilities at Nos. 12 – 26 Park Road, Burwood, subject to conditions in Annexure 'A'." 'Exhibits may be returned except for 4, 8, 9, D, M, O, Q, R, S...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment