Rahme v Blacktown City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1453
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to terms of a decision acceptable to them, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; the proceedings were therefore disposed of in accordance with that agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Orders Made After Conciliation Conferences and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; amended Development Application No. DA-17-02175 approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'residential Flat Building Approval' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Orders Made After Conciliation Conferences and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the agreed decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to terms of a decision acceptable to them, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; the proceedings were therefore disposed of in accordance with that agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; amended Development Application No. DA-17-02175 approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The Applicant is granted leave to rely upon the amended material listed in Annexure A.' 'The appeal is upheld.' "The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs under section 8.15(3) of the Environmental and Planning Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed." 'Development Application No. DA-17-02175, as amended,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment