EDH17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2019] FCA 1947
The appeal failed because it was open to the Authority to find that there were no exceptional circumstances justifying consideration of the financial hardship information or relationship information under s 473DD, given the appellant's awareness of the information and of the need and opportunity to provide information before or at the delegate stage. Once the Authority was not satisfied of exceptional circumstances, any consideration of s 473DD(b) matters was unnecessary and inconsequential. The Authority did not fail to consider the relevant review material under s 473DB: the impugned country information was either referred to in the Authority's reasons or encompassed by its findings,...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court Dismissing Judicial Review of an Immigration Assessment Authority Decision Affirming Refusal of a Safe Haven Enterprise (subclass 790) Visa / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['fast Track Reviewable Decision' 'immigration Assessment Authority' 'new Information in Exceptional Circumstances' 'review on the Papers' 'relocation Within Receiving Country' 'protection Visa' 'safe Haven Enterprise Visa' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court Dismissing Judicial Review of an Immigration Assessment Authority Decision Affirming Refusal of a Safe Haven Enterprise (subclass 790) Visa / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in failing to find that the Immigration Assessment Authority fell into jurisdictional error by failing to properly apply s 473DD of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' 'Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in failing to find that the Immigration Assessment Authority fell into jurisdictional error by failing to consider all relevant review material as required by s 473DB of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal failed because it was open to the Authority to find that there were no exceptional circumstances justifying consideration of the financial hardship information or relationship information under s 473DD, given the appellant's awareness of the information and of the need and opportunity to provide information before or at the delegate stage. Once the Authority was not satisfied of exceptional circumstances, any consideration of s 473DD(b) matters was unnecessary and inconsequential. The Authority did not fail to consider the relevant review material under s 473DB: the impugned country information was either referred to in the Authority's reasons or encompassed by its findings,...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The name of the first respondent be amended to be "Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs".' 'The appeal be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment