Leeder v Ellis [1952] UKPCHCA 2
The estate was found to be insolvent on the evidence before the trial judge; the appellate court's refusal to admit further evidence was a proper exercise of discretion; orders for provision for maintenance should not be made where the estate is insolvent.
- Parties
- Appellant: Edie Maude Leeder; Respondent (deceased Testator): Herbert Ellis; Respondent's Counsel: Sir Frank Soskice Q.C. and J. G. Le Quesne
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 1952
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal to the Privy Council From the High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- appeal allowed (Privy Council), High Court decision reversed, Full Court of Supreme Court of New South Wales order restored
- Legal Topics
- Testator's Family Maintenance, Admission of Further Evidence on Appeal, Discretion of Appellate Court, Insolvent Estate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edie Maude Leeder
Appellant
Herbert Ellis
Respondent (deceased Testator)
Sir Frank Soskice Q.C. and J. G. Le Quesne
Respondent's Counsel
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal to the Privy Council From the High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal in a family provision application
- 2 Whether the respondent widow was entitled to provision from the estate given the estate’s apparent insolvency
Ratio Decidendi
The estate was found to be insolvent on the evidence before the trial judge; the appellate court's refusal to admit further evidence was a proper exercise of discretion; orders for provision for maintenance should not be made where the estate is insolvent.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed (Privy Council), High Court decision reversed, Full Court of Supreme Court of New South Wales order restored
Orders
- Order of the High Court set aside
- Order of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of New South Wales restored
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment