Jebb, E.K. v Repatriation Commission [1988] FCA 170
The Tribunal erred in law by considering only the applicant’s entitlement as at the application date, rather than across the period from application to decision. The proper approach is to consider entitlement throughout the period within the tribunal's jurisdiction, as supported by statutory provisions and case law.
- Parties
- Applicant: Edmund Kenneth Jebb; Respondent: Repatriation Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From the Veterans' Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Outcome
- Decision under appeal set aside and matter remitted for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Veterans' Entitlements, Pensions, Special Rate, Intermediate Rate, Retroactive Entitlement, Review Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edmund Kenneth Jebb
Applicant
Repatriation Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From the Veterans' Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal erred in considering entitlement to pension only as of the application date
- 2 Whether the legislative amendments affect entitlement assessment
- 3 Whether Tribunal can consider entitlement across period between application and decision
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in law by considering only the applicant’s entitlement as at the application date, rather than across the period from application to decision. The proper approach is to consider entitlement throughout the period within the tribunal's jurisdiction, as supported by statutory provisions and case law.
Court Disposition
Decision under appeal set aside and matter remitted for reconsideration.
Orders
- The decision under appeal be set aside.
- The matter be remitted to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to be heard and decided again, with or without the taking of further evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment