Brookes v Hurstville City Council [2010] NSWLEC 1021
The proposal does not satisfy the key controls relating to density, side setbacks, open space, and landscaping as required under DCP 1, particularly in Development Area D. The lack of compliance is not justified by the site context and results in an overdevelopment inconsistent with the planning objectives. Approval is therefore refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'residential Flat Buildings' 'density Controls' 'open Space Controls' 'building Envelope Controls' 'setback Controls' 'local Environmental Plan' 'development Control Plan' 'state Environmental Planning Policy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposal constitutes overdevelopment due to non-compliance with density, open space, and setback controls in Hurstville Development Control Plan No 1 (DCP 1)' 'Whether the proposal is consistent with the objectives of the zone and relevant planning controls']
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal does not satisfy the key controls relating to density, side setbacks, open space, and landscaping as required under DCP 1, particularly in Development Area D. The lack of compliance is not justified by the site context and results in an overdevelopment inconsistent with the planning objectives. Approval is therefore refused.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'Development Application to demolish two existing dwellings and construct a 3-storey residential flat building with eight units and basement parking for 14 cars at 22B and 24 Macquarie Place, Mortdale, is refused.' 'The exhibits, except Exhibits 1 and D, are returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment