Regina v Durant [2002] NSWCCA 295

Regina v Durant [2002] NSWCCA 295

The sentence was not excessive as the applicant was properly found to have a significant role in organising and arranging the importation of a trafficable quantity of prohibited drugs, rather than acting as a mere courier. The sentencing judge applied the correct principles, and the sentence was within the appropriate range for the offence.

Parties
Applicant: Edward Charles Durant; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 June 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Drug Importation, Sentencing, Role of Offender, General Deterrence
Criminal Law Drug Importation Sentencing Role of Offender General Deterrence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Charles Durant

Applicant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Judgment on Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was excessive given the applicant's role in the offence
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should have been regarded as a mere courier
  3. 3 Whether the sentencing judge erred in the application of sentencing principles

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence was not excessive as the applicant was properly found to have a significant role in organising and arranging the importation of a trafficable quantity of prohibited drugs, rather than acting as a mere courier. The sentencing judge applied the correct principles, and the sentence was within the appropriate range for the offence.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal granted.
  • Appeal dismissed.