Hayson v The Age Company Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1538
Prior newspaper articles are not admissible for the purpose of proving bad reputation in mitigation of damages in defamation proceedings. The common law rule, as applied in Australia and not changed by the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), confines proof of bad reputation to general reputation evidence given by witnesses, not evidence of specific acts or prior publications.
- Parties
- Applicant: Edward Hayson; First Respondent: The Age Company Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Kate McClymont
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation Proceeding / Interlocutory Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
- Outcome
- Tender of MFI-5 (newspaper article) rejected as inadmissible evidence.
- Legal Topics
- Mitigation of Damages, Admissibility of Evidence, Bad Reputation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward Hayson
Applicant
The Age Company Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Kate McClymont
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Defamation Proceeding / Interlocutory Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether prior newspaper articles are admissible to prove bad reputation in mitigation of damages in a defamation action
Ratio Decidendi
Prior newspaper articles are not admissible for the purpose of proving bad reputation in mitigation of damages in defamation proceedings. The common law rule, as applied in Australia and not changed by the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), confines proof of bad reputation to general reputation evidence given by witnesses, not evidence of specific acts or prior publications.
Court Disposition
Tender of MFI-5 (newspaper article) rejected as inadmissible evidence.
Orders
- The tender of MFI-5, being an article published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper on 27 June 2006 with the headline "The day racing's credibility went on the line [-] Hayson's calls" be rejected upon the basis that it is not admissible.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment