Edward Listin Properties Pty Ltd v North Sydney Council [1999] NSWLEC 269
Refusal of the development consent is justified because the proposed development breaches the building height plane control, and the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient mitigation of adverse impacts on privacy, overshadowing, and amenity for neighbouring properties, particularly No 74 Ben Boyd Road.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Failure to Grant Development Consent / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- development consent refused
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'subdivision' 'building Height Controls' 'amenity' 'environmental Planning']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Failure to Grant Development Consent / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development breaches the building height plane control under North Sydney LEP cl 13' 'Whether the impacts on privacy, overshadowing, and amenity warrant refusal of development consent' 'Whether amended plans sufficiently address adverse impacts' 'Applicability and sufficiency of SEPP 1 objection']
Ratio Decidendi
Refusal of the development consent is justified because the proposed development breaches the building height plane control, and the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient mitigation of adverse impacts on privacy, overshadowing, and amenity for neighbouring properties, particularly No 74 Ben Boyd Road.
Court Disposition
development consent refused
Orders
- ['Development application 920/99 is determined by refusal of consent' 'The exhibits may be returned']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment